Effects of Drinking Hot Water, Cold Water, and Chicken Soup on Nasal Mucus Velocity and Nasal Airflow Resistance

      Nasal mucus velocity and nasal airflow resistance were measured in 15 healthy subjects before and at 5 and 30 minutes after drinking hot water by sip or straw, hot chicken soup by sip or straw, and cold water by sip. A sham drinking procedure with straw was also employed. Hot water by sip increased nasal mucus velocity from 6.2 to 8.4 mm per min, hot chicken soup by sip from 6.9 to 9.2 mm per min, and chicken soup by straw from 6.4 to 7.8 mm per min five minutes after administration. These increases were statistically significant compared to cold water, hot water by straw and sham. All values returned to their baseline at 30 minutes except cold water which significantly decreased the nasal mucus velocity from 7.3 to 4.5 mm per min. There were no significant changes from baseline in nasal airflow resistance 5 and 30 minutes following the above treatments. We conclude that drinking hot fluids transiently increases nasal mucus velocity in part or totally through the nasal inhalation of water vapor. Hot chicken soup, either through the aroma sensed at the posterior nares or through a mechanism related to taste, appears to possess an additional substance for increasing nasal mucus velocity. Finally, hot liquid might be superior to cold liquids in the management of fluids in upper respiratory tract infections.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to CHEST
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Kreig MB
        Green Medicine; The Search For Plants That Heal …. Rand McNally, Chicago1964: 163 (165-206, 207-222, 317-339)
        • Bloomfield AL
        A Bibliography of Internal Medicine: Selected Disease. University of Chicago Press, Chicago1960: 263
      1. German Health Resorts; Official Handbook of the German Health Resorts Association. Bonn, Deutcher Baderverband EV, 1953, 79

        • Epstein M
        Cardiovascular and renal effects of headout water immersion in man.
        Circ Res. 1976; 39: 619-628
        • Caroline NL
        • Schwartz H
        Chicken soup rebound and relapse of pneumonia: report of a case.
        Chest. 1975; 67: 215-216
        • Soffer A
        Chicken soup, Sippy milk diets and bed rest for hepatitis.
        Chest. 1975; 67: 214-215
      2. Yergin BM, Saketkhoo K, Michaelson E, et al: A roentgenographic method for measuring nasal mucous velocity. J Appl Physiol (in press)

      3. Saketkhoo K, Yergin BM, Januszkiewicz A, et al: The effect of nasal decongestants on nasal mucus velocity. Am Rev Respir Dis (in press)

        • Solomon WR
        • McLean JA
        • Cookingham C
        • et al.
        Measurement of nasal airway resistance.
        J Allergy. 1965; 36: 62-69
        • Taylor G
        • Shivalkar PR
        Changes in nasal resistance on antigenic challenge in allergic rhinitis.
        Clin Allergy. 1971; 1: 63-73
        • Bang BG
        • Mukherjee AL
        • Bang FB
        Human nasal mucous flow rates.
        Johns Hopkins Med J. 1967; 121: 38-48
        • Ralston HJ
        • Kerr WT
        Vascular responses of the nasal mucosa to thermal stimuli with some observation on skin temperature.
        Am J Physiol. 1945; 144: 305-310
        • Andersen I
        • Jensen PL
        • Reed SE
        • et al.
        Induced rhinovirus infection under controlled exposure to sulfur dioxide.
        Arch Environ Health. 1977; 31: 120-126