Methodology for Development of Guidelines for Lung Cancer

Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

      Background

      The objective was to develop high-quality and comprehensive evidence-based guidelines on the diagnosis and management of lung cancer.

      Methods

      A carefully crafted panel of lung cancer experts, methodologists, and other specialists was assembled and reviewed for relevant conflicts of interest. The American College of Chest Physicians guideline methodology was used. Population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO)-based key questions and defined criteria for eligible studies were developed to inform the search strategies, subsequent evidence summaries, and recommendations. Research studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, where they existed, were assessed for quality and summarized to inform the recommendations.

      Results

      Each recommendation was developed with supporting evidence and the consensus of the writing committees. Controversial recommendations were identified for further consultation by the entire panel, with anonymous voting to achieve consensus.

      Conclusions

      The final recommendations can be trusted by health-care providers, patients, and other stakeholders since they are based on the current evidence in these areas and were developed with trustworthy processes for guideline development.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to CHEST
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines
        Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Institute of Medicine, Washington DC2011
        • Qaseem A
        • Forland F
        • Macbeth F
        • Ollenschläger G
        • Phillips S
        • van der Wees P
        • Board of Trustees of the Guidelines International Network
        Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines.
        Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156: 525-531
        • American College of Chest Physicians
        • Diagnosis and management of lung cancer
        ACCP evidence-based guidelines.
        Chest. 2003; 123: 1S-328S
        • American College of Chest Physicians. Diagnosis and management of lung cancer
        ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).
        Chest. 2007; 132: 1S-422S
        • Alberts WM
        Introduction to the third edition: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
        Chest. 2013; 143: 38S-40S
        • Leone FT
        • Evers-Casey S
        • Toll BA
        • Vachani A
        Treatment of tobacco use in lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
        Chest. 2013; 143: e61S-e77S
        • Silvestri GA
        • Gonzalez AV
        • Jantz MA
        • et al.
        Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
        Chest. 2013; 143: e211S-e250S
        • Ramnath N
        • Dilling TJ
        • Harris LJ
        Treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
        Chest. 2013; 143: e314S-e340S
        • Detterbeck FC
        • Postmus PE
        • Tanoue LT
        The stage classification of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
        Chest. 2013; 143: e191S-e210S
        • Wisnivesky JP
        • Yung RC-W
        • Mathur PN
        • Zulueta JJ
        Diagnosis and treatment of bronchial intraepithelial neoplasia and early lung cancer of the central airways: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
        Chest. 2013; 143: e263S-e277S
        • Howington JA
        • Blum MG
        • Chang AC
        • Balekian AA
        • Murthy SC
        Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
        Chest. 2013; 143: e278S-e313S
        • Shrier I
        • Boivin JF
        • Platt RW
        • et al.
        The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8: 19
        • Guyatt G
        • Akl EA
        • Hirsh J
        • et al.
        The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution.
        Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152: 738-741
        • American College of Chest Physicians
        Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
        Chest. 2012; 141: e1S-e801S
        • Oxman AD
        • Guyatt GH
        Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44: 1271-1278
        • Shea BJ
        • Grimshaw JM
        • Wells GA
        • et al.
        Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7: 10
        • Whiting P
        • Rutjes A
        • Westwood M
        • et al.
        QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
        Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 529-536
        • Guyatt G
        • Gutterman D
        • Baumann MH
        • et al.
        Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force.
        Chest. 2006; 129: 174-181
        • Guyatt GH
        • Cook DJ
        • Jaeschke R
        • Pauker SG
        • Schünemann HJ
        Grades of recommendation for antithrombotic agents: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition).
        Chest. 2008; 133: 123S-131S
        • Jaeschke R
        • Guyatt GH
        • Dellinger P
        • GRADE Working Group
        • et al.
        Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive.
        BMJ. 2008; 337: a744
        • Bach PB
        • Mirkin JN
        • Oliver TK
        • et al.
        Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2012; 307: 2418-2429
        • Guyatt G
        • Baumann MH
        • Pauker S
        • et al.
        Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force.
        Chest. 2006; 129: 182-187
        • The ADAPTE Collaboration
        The ADAPTE Process: Resource Toolkit for Guideline Adaptation. version 2.0.
        (Accessed September 12, 2012.)