Outcomes of Patients Ventilated With Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation With Pressure Support

A Comparative Propensity Score Study


      Few data are available regarding the benefits of one mode over another for ventilatory support. We set out to compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support (SIMV-PS) compared with assist-control (A/C) ventilation as their primary mode of ventilatory support.


      This was a secondary analysis of an observational study conducted in 349 ICUs from 23 countries. A propensity score stratified analysis was used to compare 350 patients ventilated with SIMV-PS with 1,228 patients ventilated with A/C ventilation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.


      In a logistic regression model, patients were more likely to receive SIMV-PS if they were from North America, had lower severity of illness, or were ventilated postoperatively or for trauma. SIMV-PS was less likely to be selected if patients were ventilated because of asthma or coma, or if they developed complications such as sepsis or cardiovascular failure during mechanical ventilation. In the stratified analysis according to propensity score, we did not find significant differences in the in-hospital mortality. After adjustment for propensity score, overall effect of SIMV-PS on in-hospital mortality was not significant (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.77–1.42; P = .78).


      In our cohort of ventilated patients, ventilation with SIMV-PS compared with A/C did not offer any advantage in terms of clinical outcomes, despite treatment-allocation bias that would have favored SIMV-PS.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


      Subscribe to CHEST
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Sasoon CSH
        Intermittent mandatory ventilation.
        in: Tobin MJ Principles and Practice of Mechanical Ventilation. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY2006: 201-220
        • Downs JB
        • Klein Jr, EF
        • Desautels D
        • Modell JH
        • Kirby RR
        Intermittent mandatory ventilation: a new approach to weaning patients from mechanical ventilators.
        Chest. 1973; 64: 331-335
        • Downs JB
        • Perkins HM
        • Modell JH
        Intermittent mandatory ventilation. An evaluation.
        Arch Surg. 1974; 109: 519-523
        • Downs JB
        • Block AJ
        • Vennum KB
        Intermittent mandatory ventilation in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
        Anesth Analg. 1974; 53: 437-443
        • Marini JJ
        • Smith TC
        • Lamb VJ
        External work output and force generation during synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation. Effect of machine assistance on breathing effort.
        Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988; 138: 1169-1179
        • Imsand C
        • Feihl F
        • Perret C
        • Fitting JW
        Regulation of inspiratory neuromuscular output during synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation.
        Anesthesiology. 1994; 80: 13-22
        • Leung P
        • Jubran A
        • Tobin MJ
        Comparison of assisted ventilator modes on triggering, patient effort, and dyspnea.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997; 155: 1940-1948
        • Brochard L
        • Rauss A
        • Benito S
        • et al.
        Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 150: 896-903
        • Esteban A
        • Frutos F
        • Tobin MJ
        • et al.
        • Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group
        A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation.
        N Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 345-350
        • Jounieaux V
        • Duran A
        • Levi-Valensi P
        Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with and without pressure support ventilation in weaning patients with COPD from mechanical ventilation.
        Chest. 1994; 105: 1204-1210
        • Venus B
        • Smith RA
        • Mathru M
        National survey of methods and criteria used for weaning from mechanical ventilation.
        Crit Care Med. 1987; 15: 530-533
        • Esteban A
        • Anzueto A
        • Alía I
        • et al.
        How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161: 1450-1458
        • Esteban A
        • Anzueto A
        • Frutos F
        • Mechanical Ventilation International Study Group
        • et al.
        Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study.
        JAMA. 2002; 287: 345-355
        • Esteban A
        • Ferguson ND
        • Meade MO
        • VENTILA Group
        • et al.
        Evolution of mechanical ventilation in response to clinical research.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 177: 170-177
        • Boles JM
        • Bion J
        • Connors A
        • et al.
        Weaning from mechanical ventilation.
        Eur Respir J. 2007; 29: 1033-1056
        • Rose L
        • Presneill JJ
        • Johnston L
        • Nelson S
        • Cade JF
        Ventilation and weaning practices in Australia and New Zealand.
        Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009; 37: 99-107
        • Rathgeber J
        • Schorn B
        • Falk V
        • Kazmaier S
        • Spiegel T
        • Burchardi H
        The influence of controlled mandatory ventilation (CMV), intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and biphasic intermittent positive airway pressure (BIPAP) on duration of intubation and consumption of analgesics and sedatives. A prospective analysis in 596 patients following adult cardiac surgery.
        Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1997; 14: 576-582
        • Schachter EN
        • Tucker D
        • Beck GJ
        Does intermittent mandatory ventilation accelerate weaning?.
        JAMA. 1981; 246: 1210-1214
        • Hastings PR
        • Bushnell LS
        • Skillman JJ
        • Weintraub RM
        • Hedley-Whyte J
        Cardiorespiratory dynamics during weaning with IMV versus spontaneous ventilation in good-risk cardiac-surgery patients.
        Anesthesiology. 1980; 53: 429-431
        • Tomlinson JR
        • Miller KS
        • Lorch DG
        • Smith L
        • Reines HD
        • Sahn SA
        A prospective comparison of IMV and T-piece weaning from mechanical ventilation.
        Chest. 1989; 96: 348-352
        • Weitzen S
        • Lapane KL
        • Toledano AY
        • Hume AL
        • Mor V
        Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review.
        Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004; 13: 841-853
        • Bone RC
        • Balk RA
        • Cerra FB
        • et al.
        The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis.
        Chest. 1992; 101: 1644-1655