Too Many Patients…A Framework to Guide Statewide Allocation of Scarce Mechanical Ventilation During Disasters

Published:October 11, 2018DOI:
      The threat of a catastrophic public health emergency causing life-threatening illness or injury on a massive scale has prompted extensive federal, state, and local preparedness efforts. Modeling studies suggest that an influenza pandemic similar to that of 1918 would require ICU and mechanical ventilation capacity that is significantly greater than what is available. Several groups have published recommendations for allocating life-support measures during a public health emergency. Because there are multiple ethically permissible approaches to allocating scarce life-sustaining resources and because the public will bear the consequences of these decisions, knowledge of public perspectives and moral points of reference on these issues is critical. Here we describe a critical care disaster resource allocation framework developed following a statewide community engagement process in Maryland. It is intended to assist hospitals and public health agencies in their independent and coordinated response to an officially declared catastrophic health emergency in which demand for mechanical ventilators exceeds the capabilities of all surge response efforts and in which there has been an executive order to implement scarce resource allocation procedures. The framework, built on a basic scoring system with modifications for specific considerations, also creates an opportunity for the legal community to review existing laws and liability protections in light of a specific disaster response process.

      Key Words


      PELOD-2 (Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2), SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to CHEST
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. US Department of Health & Human Services. HHS pandemic influenza plan. Accessed March 19, 2018.

        • Meltzer M.I.
        • Patel A.
        • Ajao S.V.
        • et al.
        Estimates of the demand for mechanical ventilation in the United States during an influenza pandemic.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 60: S52-S57
        • Christian M.D.
        • Hawryluck L.
        • Wax R.S.
        • et al.
        Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic.
        CMAJ. 2006; 175: 1377-1381
        • Christian M.D.
        • Devereaux A.V.
        • Dichter J.R.
        • et al.
        Introduction and executive summary: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.
        Chest. 2014; 146: 8S-34S
        • White D.B.
        • Katz M.H.
        • Luce J.M.
        • Lo B.
        Who should receive life support during a public health emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisions.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150: 132-138
        • Zahner S.J.
        • Corrado S.M.
        Local health department partnerships with faith-based organizations.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004; 10: 258-265
        • Cavalier R.
        Approaching Deliberative Democracy: Theory and Practice.
        Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh, PA2011
        • Daugherty Biddison E.L.
        • Gwon H.S.
        • Schoch-Spana M.
        • et al.
        Scarce resource allocation during disasters: a mixed method community engagement study.
        Chest. 2018; 153: 187-195
        • Raith E.P.
        • Udy A.A.
        • Bailey M.
        • et al.
        Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 290-300
        • Leteurtre S.
        • Duhamel A.
        • Salleron J.
        • et al.
        PELOD-2: an update of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score.
        Crit Care Med. 2013; 41: 1761-1773
        • Osler T.
        • Glance L.G.
        • Hosmer D.W.
        Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries: extending and updating the Baux score.
        J Trauma. 2010; 68: 690-697
        • Ferreira F.L.
        • Peres Bota S.
        • Bross A.
        • et al.
        Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients.
        JAMA. 2001; 286: 1754-1758
        • Christian M.D.
        • Sprung C.L.
        • King M.A.
        • et al.
        Triage: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.
        Chest. 2014; 146: 61S-74S